A case was brought on his behalf because he was jailed for way too long with no charges filed against him along with other problems that were in violation of his Constitutional rights. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It really is believed that this was only done this that the Supreme Court will never hear the case since the Bush Administration might have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed that had to complete utilizing the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser and less crimes that are specific Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. He was subjected to and the length of time he was detained he was not mentally competent to stand trial before he was set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that because of the torture. A judge ruled which he was competent and then he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007).
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to give it towards the 8th of December, giving the power to your Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was regarded as the last day associated with the Patriot Act since no legislation that is new been passed. With this extension, America waits for hearings to be held by the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, that which was a surprise to many was the undeniable fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension associated with the Patriot Act. One in particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the best democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, would like to see this extension all of the way right through to 2013. Many of the 27 Republicans who voted resistant to the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American people will face the best risk of out-of-control prosecutions along with the possibility of out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) as well as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform associated with the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will require advantage of the bill and make use of of the capacity to trouble innocent people in the communities that are muslim-American. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee from the requirement for reform of this Patriot Act, arguing that the federal government track of communications without any proof is a violation associated with the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used buy essays online the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to obtain reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on more than one occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any investigations that are unlawful the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
for instance, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens seeking to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system associated with Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) managed to get clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More government that is stringent and thorough criminal background checks are only another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also opposed to most of the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that was placed into destination to protect citizens’ privacy. A discomfort in what they do because their actions are subject to review if the government suspects they are engaging in anything terrorist related at that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet in the privacy of their home feel. For Internet users, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and systems that are peer-to-peer. Also put in the middle of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public have to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, in the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
I really believe that certain components of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not just from Congress, but additionally from the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by making sure the laws they pass do not not in favor of the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments associated with Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue to review cases to ensure that the Constitution is upheld even when it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it really is today however it is feared that money maybe the downfall of your nation. The freedom of life, property and liberty has turned into greed. Terrorist acts up against the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, power and money scares them more. The people vote to have government representation however the people have to be more a part of the decision making process. If you elect someone to office and additionally they try not to get the job done correctly, it is up to us as Americans to ensure that those people usually do not stay in office. That can only be done if people get more mixed up in process that is political not only be happy with how are you affected.
The expression “land of the free” can be used too generously. The way in which it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against precisely what this country is short for and deprives us all of our civil liberties. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. In the event that Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the folks it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president shouldn’t be the deciding aspect in deeming an individual a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. If it’s unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes up against the folks of the nation these are typically occupying, it must be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics which can be considered torture when wanting to elicit information from a person, whether see your face be an American citizen or not.
The protection of your nation could be the highest therefore the most important responsibility of your government. The laws created are meant to be when you look at the best interest regarding the citizens. The power to look after their welfare and to protect them after all, the citizens give the government. Individuals with this standard of power sometimes pay attention to the whole without rational and also the individual has to pay the price. There must be a limit in the power associated with the government, but if the nation’s way of life, liberty and quest for property come in jeopardy we need to consider the rational the us government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what is being carried out. In order to elicit change, we need to remain true and do something positive about it.